Ethics within the games industry
There are a lot of ethical
issues within the games industry, both with the games and within them. Games
are a twisted version of real life, in them there is every imaginable scenario,
but just because we can create such scenarios do not mean that they are
ethically right and accepted.
A game itself is a story and
within that story we are often given choices. In RPG games like mass effect,
fable and bioshock we are given ethically choices that will change the
character and the story. We chose our
version of what we think is right and wrong. We can play as a hero or an anti
hero, an anti hero being someone who is a hero but does so in a mean, hard core
kind of way. For example within mass effect we continually have decision on
where to go, what to say and what to do. We decide how to respond to things, we
can be good and caring or we can be mean and to the point. Our choices affect
the game massively; our characters appearance changes, looking more evil or
good depending on how you play, and the story can change. Each mass effect game ends with a choice. In the
first one you can choose to save the council or let them die; this is an
ethically choice and will affect the story and what is to come. Games like this where we can choice our own moral compass are very popular, and adding this simple human nature, of choosing what we want, increases the popularity of the game and as such how much money it produces.
Many games have a pre set
story, in these we aren’t given a choices, you will be forced to
play that path whether you agree with it or not. This is where games start to
get controversial. Adding content to a game that is considered ethically wrong
or questionable can easily ruin the games reputations. Games such as grand theft
auto, where there is a high level of violence and your aim is to do bad things,
have received bad reputations as parents believe they set a bad example to
children and encourage and lead to violence. Games like this seem to accept and
encourage things that are considered ethically wrong. For example in COD modern
warfare 2 the mission “no Russia”
allows people to play from the position of a terrorist, shooting down innocent
civilians. You are not discouraged away from this, the game does not tell you
that this is morally wrong and that it is bad that such things have
happened. The game seems to approach this controversial scenario light
heartedly. Making it seem like just another part of life, this set a bad
example for children and so many parents will have stopped their children from
playing it, which affects the amount of purchases of the game. There is an
option to skip the missions but this will not change the fact that parents will
disagree with the game and so sales of the game will reduce. Controversial
games like this do get banned. The first game banned for controversial
violence being death race in 2000, this game was banned as the aim was to run
people over, a very ethically wrong thing. Even though the game was extremely
simple and you could barely tell what a human was and what was a car, the game
was banned as it was thought to be setting a bad example. Many violent games
have been banned, games like man hunt, mortal kombat and doom or the reason
regulator bodies like ESRB were set up. To monitor and give appropriate age
ranges for every game.
Games may also be offensive
to races or religions and so games developers must ensure there games will not
cause offence, and that there point is clearly presented. We live in a society
where everyone is considered equal and so games developers must ensure that
they do not segregate a certain race or present them in a stereotype form.
Resident evil five is a good example of what can happen. There is resident evil
5 trailer of Chris Redfield the American hero shooting African zombies.
However to those who do not know the series this trailer can seem to be just
about Redfield killing Africans. In this trailer it is hard to distinguish
between an ordinary African and an African zombie and so the trailer presents
the game as something very different to what it is. It shows it as just an American kill
Africans, which is morally very wrong, it is ethically wrong to kill anyone and
especially wrong to kill someone just for there race/religion. So games
producers have to make sure they present there game correctly and stay away
from ethically questionable scenarios. As it will put people off the game and
gain it a bad reputation.
The games industry itself
can be ethically questionable. To many companies money is the most important
out come of making a game, and so many companies squeeze as much money out of
us as possible. This can be very simple things like giving pre order DLC. An
added item or mission within the game will pressurise people into pre ordering
the game, and in doing so the game maker ensures they sell a set amount on the
day of release. This is questionable as to some it seems wrong that those with
money to buy games fast are rewarded and those who must save, receive nothing, or
may be forced to pay for the items. This seems even more questionable when the
DLC is already on the desk, but you required too pay to unlock it.
Bibliography
http://www.bit-tech.net/gaming/2006/03/06/games_ethics_issue/1
(accessed 4/10/2012)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6QjLi2bCZU(accessed 4/10/2012)
http://www.entertainmentbuddha.com/why-is-it-so-hard-to-play-the-bad-guy-in-morality-based-games/
(accessed 4/10/2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment